Fire Safety at Lanhydrock


 

Lanhydrockfire

On 4 April 1881 Lanhydrock House, the most impressive mansion in south-west England, caught fire (above). Lord Robartes immediately commissioned the architect Richard Coad to refurbish the house as an ‘unpretentious’ family residence. In doing so he incorporated the latest in Victorian fire prevention solutions, most notably 300mm thick concrete ceilings supplied by Dennett and Ingles of London to stop the spread of fire between floors, patent fireproof plaster, structural ironwork to hold these great loads in place and an internal fire hydrant system drawing on 200,000 gallons of water stored in a reservoir in the High Gardens. Despite the employment of high-Victorian technologies Lord Robartes curiously did not consider gas lighting or electrical power safe and so built a lamp room from which paraffin lamps were wicked and primed.

One hundred and thirty years after the family moved back into the house, and sixty years after the National Trust acquired the property, the Fire Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order was legislated through Parliament. This Act places emphasis on a risk based attitude towards fire assessment, most notably in reducing the possibility of fire starting in the first place or, in the worse-case scenario of fire being confirmed, safeguarding life by providing a safe means of escape and subsequently damage limitation in restricting the spread of fire.

Fire Risk Assessment

In response to the new Act we initiated a detailed risk assessment. On completion we instigated a phased schedule of works to deal with issues identified in the report and to explore varying building solutions to create a sustainable future for Lanhydrock.

Fortunately, the constructional techniques employed by the Victorians gave us a head start. The concrete ceilings, for example, still offer good fire resistance between floors, a methodology known as horizontal compartmentation. Furthermore, the iron fabrication uses little or no timber beneath the floors and in the roof.

The risk assessment however did identify several issues of concern.

The first was the need to repair all pipe-work and cabling breaches between floors and compartments in order to stop any potential fire spreading (below). These breaches varied from small cable routes to gaps that a whole body would pass through with ease. Once done we commissioned an independent specialist to certificate all existing vertical and horizontal compartment walls.

Sealing all breaches into property

Second, the risk assessment identified the need for two new vertical compartments to be created, one to separate the internationally important 17th-century Gallery from the rest of the house, the other was to create a second protected staircase for means of escape. To do this we had to introduce new bespoke fire doors into the historic interior. However, for certification we had to consider all existing historic doors in these compartments, making sure that they had the correct intumescent and cold smoke seals fitted. Furthermore, to prevent a potential fire spreading through the door frame itself we had to dismantle the door architraves and seal all gaps with intumescent foams and sealants, treat all combustible linings with reversible intumescent varnishes and paints and seal all voids beneath and above the door.

Thirdly, it was vital to separate the high risk areas, such as catering and boiler room, from the historic interiors. As both of these areas contain gas burning equipment we needed to consider gas safety shut off valves, fire shutters activated by the automatic fire alarms, safety of flues removing the products of combustion, flue proving systems and electrical isolating switches.

A fourth element to the project was replacing old unsupported systems hence a new automatic alarm system has been fitted into the property. To create the earliest warning possible the fire alarm specification includes the installation of an intelligent fire panel that feeds addressable information into to localised pagers via a radio link and thence direct to the fire service and monitoring station through protected telephone cables. In addition we have installed six air sampling devices, known as Vesda units, which analyse air patterns and activate pre- and full- alarms on discovery of smoke particles in the air. These pieces of equipment are interfaced into auxillery safety components such as mechanical door contacts, gas leak detection systems, fusible links on boilers and external fire shutter and fire curtain systems.

Statutory Protection and Curatorship

The real challenge of this project has been effecting statutory changes without any noticeable impact on the historic interior. Lanhydrock has maximum statutory protection from central government, it is grade 1 listed by English Heritage, our statutory consultee, which means it is of ‘exceptional architectural and historical interest’ − only 2.5% of listed buildings in Great Britain have grade 1 listed status.

All of the activities mentioned here have, understandably, raised pertinent questions within the National Trust over conservation practice and modern intervention techniques − questions that, for example, examined the longevity, performance and aesthetic appearance of new materials, looked closely at natural and artificial ventilation systems to maintain humidity control throughout the newly created compartments and challenged the potential for physical damage to the same historic interior that we were trying to protect.

Placing such an emphasis on good conservation practices and high curatorial standards means lots of dialogue. One of the real benefits of communication was our ability to thin out the fire risk assessment by looking carefully at the historical layout and operational management of the house. For example, it was initially determined that for continuity the six vertical compartment walls running from the roof structure down through the property would have to be terminated in the tunnels beneath the house. But as a highly protected bat roost this was impractical. So after discussions with our architect and fire specialists we decided that by fire stopping all breaches in the tunnel walls and roof, and by separating the adjoining boiler room from the tunnel with the installation of a bespoke automatic fire curtain, we could treat the tunnel as a single horizontal compartment.

Another thorny issue was dealing with the directive to upgrade a Victorian Drawing Room door with beautiful etched Aesthetic movement-style glass in order to create a 30 minute fire rated door. To do this, either with fire-rated secondary glazing or intumescent varnish, would have essentially destroyed the heritage we were trying to protect. After looking at other solutions, such as, a fire shutter or curtain we came to a pragmatic solution which was to consider the volume of the room in terms of its ability to contain smoke in the barrel-vaulted ceiling thereby facilitating a safe means of escape. Both of these simple solutions saved money, time and, more importantly, unnecessary damage to the historic interiors.

A further challenge, and one I am sure we all share, is how to comply with statutory requirements regarding, for example, emergency lighting, fire signage and self-closing fire doors without compromising the historic integrity of the building. Thankfully, once again, management systems came to our rescue. For emergency lighting the historic lights were deployed using battery packs connected to inverter switches that automatically switched power supplies to battery back-up in the event of mains power failure. This meant that no specific bespoke escape lighting was needed. In order to alleviate the need for excessive signage we operate an evacuation procedure led by volunteer room guides who chaperone visitors from the building to muster points outside while closing fire doors is done manually as part of the evacuation procedure. Solutions, like these, have allowed us to retain the authenticity, appearance and value of Lanhydrock.

This level of preventative fire protection is aspirational for all National Trust properties yet, one element of the Fire Safety Order that we live with daily is our responsibility for record keeping. Maintaining our duty of care for historic buildings means that we need to carry out and record fire alarm and emergency lighting testing, fire evacuation training and certification of fire-fighting water supplies, back-up battery packs, gas boilers, gas supply pipework, fire extinguishers, chimneys that host open fires and electrical installations. Our policy is to install electrical supplies in mineral insulated cables which have higher fire integrity than PVC cabling and a much greater life span. As part of the fire risk assessment the cabling itself is certificated every five years while all appliances such as, computers, printers, vacuum cleaners, kettles &c are tested and certificated annually.

Our fire risk strategy aims for elimination, avoidance or control of risk at source. For this reason halogen lighting is banned in our properties, as is all hot works, although we are now beginning to light open fires but only with stringent risk controls in place such as architect inspection of the chimney’s with fibre-optic cameras, using seasoned logs for burning, having appropriate fire screens and regular chimney sweeping. To add to this list opening the attraction to visitors, filming, housekeeping works, events and managing contractors have to be assessed on a case-by-case basis. It must be stressed that however good your fire culture lapses will occur − only recently I found logs and cardboard being stored beneath an escape stairway and keeping fire exits clear can be quite a challenge.

Emergency Response

Emergency planning is a key part of fire strategy. Plans should take a pragmatic approach to salvage operations not least because we have to be realistic in that we would not be allowed into a potentially burning building without the authority of the fire service. Our role in an emergency is to activate staff to site either from a telephone tree or call out system. Once staff arrive to site we need to monitor and manage arrival, establish an effective command and control structure and establish and equip salvage teams who will stay well out of the way of the fire-fighting operation but be in readiness to spring into action when asked. Our role as curators is to facilitate the progress of the operation by advising on aspects as diverse as room layout, systems infrastructures, priority salvage, storage and care of retrieved items and afterwards deal with site security and inventory checking.

Having been on several fire exercises I have witnessed first-hand how plans can be compromised. One exercise I attended became completely overwhelmed by too much unnecessary radio communication; another took 20 minutes to locate the front door key having to engage in small talk with the fire service whilst the hunt was on. At another a salvage operator severed his thumb with a knife cutting bubble wrap in the dark in order to wrap ceramics – surely a better plan would have been to get the ceramics out first and then protect them.

Working closely with the fire service has allowed us to rehearse our comprehensive emergency procedure plan and look at our infrastructure to support fire and rescue systems, such as, the installation of deep hard-standings in our courtyard to accommodate specialist high-level cranes, rehearsing tunnel rescue and rope techniques and drawing back-up water supplies from the river, one mile away.

Curatorial Duty

Throughout our fire risk assessment project we have made well-informed decisions, based in good practice and on sound research. It was always an aspiration for the project team to maintain meticulous records of the works in order be accountable for the changes we, as custodians, were making to our heritage. Hence, our comprehensive ‘as built’ documents records, both in textual and photographic form, the before and after changes and the logic that we have applied in implementing change.

The proverbial title of this paper ‘Heaven Helps those who Help Themselves’ is drawn from an 1879 copy of a journal called the ‘The Fireman’. It implies that those of us with a duty of care for a house and collection must realise that the effectiveness of any solution will rely on the amount of effort that is put into its preparation. It is a perilous task to forage into the unknown world of endless logistics and permutations, particularly in our hope that such strategies will never be deployed; nevertheless less it is an absolute crucial professional duty.

Spring-time at Lanhydrock


Damage caused by insect pests is an age-old problem. References occur in the Bible: ‘Thou makest his beauty to consume away, like as it were a moth fretting a garment’ (Psalm 39), and in Shakespeare’s ‘Rape of Lucrece’ ‘To fill with worm-holes stately monuments; To feed Oblivion with decay of things’.

Pest damage in one of the Gallery books

Pest damage in one of the Gallery books

Pest damage in country house collections has always been rife, not least because of the combination of damp, unheated rooms and lots of edible, organic artefacts. Housekeeping books and guides became popular in the eighteenth-century as house owners realised the potential damage of infestation. Susanna Whatman in her housekeeping book of 1776, gave strict instructions to her servants for the control of moth in the carpets and bug infestations in books. Likewise, the letters of Lanhydrock’s nineteenth-century chatelaine, Anna Maria Agar (1771-1861), show that she was alert to the need of heat, ventilation and light in controlling rodents and insect pests from damaging her important collection of pictures and furniture.

Today, as it was historically, the ‘putting the house to bed’ winter programme remains a vital period for us to monitor, control and manage the damage caused by a plethora of pests. Prevention is certainly better than cure, so good housekeeping is always the best method of keeping pests at bay. However, Lanhydrock, as well as having 51 rooms on display, has many storage areas for textiles, carpets, documents, books and furniture which, although cared for, do not receive the daily attention of the conservation team. The blacked-out conditions protect the contents against the harmful affects of light but can also encourage mould growth and dust accumulation, which, in turn, will allow insects and rodents to thrive. So throughout the whole house we place sticky insect traps which are checked every week during the year. These are checked regularly and monitored closely and any findings are recorded and acted upon. These traps attract three main insect pests.

 The Clothes Moth

Clothes moths hide in dark, undisturbed areas. They are about a quarter of an inch in length and they scuttle around rather than fly. As with most pests, it is the larvae which cause the damage. The clothes moth can lay 40 to 50 eggs over a period of two to three weeks and when the eggs are all laid the insect dies. These eggs hatch in between four and ten days in warm weather and the larval period lasts from between thirty-five days to two and a half years. As they love to lay their eggs in threads of fabric, if left undiscovered they can completely destroy textiles within months.

Good housekeeping and cleanliness is important in combating moth infestation. Several years ago we packed up two woollen and fur coats in tissue and placed them in a large drawer for the winter months to protect them from the light. Three months later they were carefully removed and unpacked to put back on display. As we opened the drawer we immediately knew we had a problem. Lots of moth flew out and on closer inspection we discovered that they had completely eaten their way through the coats rendering them beyond repair.

Many lessons were learnt that year. We now check every item before we pack it and store it away. All items in storage are checked on a regular basis. So if you have things tucked away in your attics, make sure you check them regularly. Moths as well as other insects love breeding in places where they won’t be disturbed, so make sure you disturb them as often as you can.

 The Furniture Beetle

This is more commonly known as the woodworm. The adults do not feed, they just reproduce. The female will lay her eggs in cracks or holes in wood and they will hatch after approximately three weeks. The larvae will then bore through the timber for between three to four years. When they are ready to pupate they are drawn nearer to the surface, excavating small spaces as they go. The adults soon break through to the surface spilling dust, which is called frass. These are our first visible signs that we have an infestation.

 Australian Spider Beetle

Like woodworm, spider beetle appear during the spring. Although they usually like to live on cereal, the ones who visit us at Lanhydrock like to feed on our very precious books in the Gallery. Our last major infestation was nearly six years ago when volunteers and house staff painstakingly removed all 3,000 books from their shelves to check for any signs of damage. The book presses were then treated with insecticide, air circulation was upgraded and the presses themselves were damp-proofed. Comprehensive records are made to record any infestation and treatment. These records show that we have had specific problems about every six years. So, when considering that out last major problem was in 2000 it would seem that our next infestation is on the horizon.

In protecting your contents against pest damage remember, prevention is always better than cure. Good packing, cleanliness of storage or presentation, sound humidity control and regular checking will go some way in caring for your items. 

Anne Marie Woof, House Steward

A Ghost Caught on Camera at Lanhydrock?


Can this be a ghost, caught on camera in the 17th-century Gallery at Lanhydrock? Or is it simply a trick of the light?

Can this be a ghost, caught on camera in the 17th-century Gallery at Lanhydrock? Or is it simply a trick of the light?

A Chronology of Christmas AD354 to 1957


Christmas at Lanhydrock

Christmas at Lanhydrock

354                  Roman chronology gives 25 December as birth date of Christ

567                  Council of Tours:  12 days between Nativity and Epiphany to be sacred and festive season

598                  On Christmas Day 10,000 Anglo-Saxons converted by Augustine (December 25 beginning of Anglo-Saxon year)

c642-9            Relics of ‘original’ crib brought to Rome

1223                St Francis of Assisi makes 1st Christmas crib in Grecchio, Italy

 An English Medieval Christmas

  • Season lasted for 12 days following Christmas Day – evergreen decorations, yule log, games: skittles, cards, singing, dancing, plays; visits from mummers
  • Brawn, roast beef, “plum-pottage”, minced pies, special Christmas ale consumed
  • Christmas boxes (small sums of money given to apprentices, mentioned e.g.1419), – gifts given at New Year, usually food by tenants to landlords (Queen Elizabeth I demanded presents from her courtiers!), feasts given by the gentry and aristocracy in their country houses over the period Christmas Eve to New Year.
  • Lord of Misrule appointed from the household became the master of ceremonies, Bean King chose by the finding of a dried bean in the Twelfth Night Cake
  • Christmas day church services, music was played, but ‘carols’ only gradually evolved into Christmas hymns, and after the Reformation, carols were seldom sung in churches as they were regarded as papist
  • References in English sources to ‘Christmas pies’ – possibly the origin of twelfth cakes, then Christmas cakes.
  • Turkeys brought from America to Europe – c1542 arrive in England (William Strickland uses a turkey in his coat-of-arms c1550).  NB there was confusion with the guinea fowl from Turkey
  • In 1573 plum porridge was first recorded as ‘plum pottage’

The Puritans

Christmas criticised both for boisterousness, drunkenness etc. And because it was particularly celebrated by the Catholics; various measures were taken to ban Christmas, but the pros and cons were debated throughout the period e.g.

 1644      Christmas Day declared by Parliament a day of fasting not feasting;

Christmas Eve 1652 – a proclamation that shops should be open and the markets kept on the 25th

1657                A number of people attending church services on 25 December in London were arrested

1660                Christmas restored with the monarchy (Charles II), e.g. Maidstone, Kent, held the first Christmas service for 17 years – although some more boisterous    customs, like the Lord of Misrule seem not to have been revived.  Celebrations were still mainly on Twelfth day and night with Bean King and Queen and other characters dressing up – this became more like charades

 c1670              Christmas pudding mutates from the earlier plum porridge

 The Long Eighteenth Century

 William thought to have introduced from Holland the custom of St Nicholas filling shoes with presents on 6 December (straw was put out for his white horse) – Georgian era many customs fell away among urban middle classes, London houses decorated with laurel wreathes, customs kept in the country of yule log etc.

 1695              Bank of England employees forbidden to accept Christmas boxes – the custom had began to change during the 17th century and servants and tradesmen began to demand and extort ever larger amounts of money

 1717               26 December John Rich put on ‘Harlequin executed’ at Lincoln’s Inn Fields Theatre – his entertainments called harlequinades or ballet-pantomimes

 1773              ‘Jack the Giant Killer’ perhaps earliest pantomime comparable to modern shows

 1780s+         Queen Charlotte (German wife of George III) is thought to have been the first to introduce Christmas trees to England – a custom documented in Germany since the 16th –century

1789               Journal entry by Mrs Papendick: her husband proposed having “an illuminated tree according to the German fashion” (and see 1840s)

 1820s              Poinsett finds Mexican shrub which now bears his name.  Introduced to Britain in the 1830s, but not widely available until dwarf plants are cultivated in the 1960s

 1822                    Poem ‘A visit from St. Nicholas’ (often called ‘Night before Christmas’) written by Clement Moore – published anonymously in1826 in U.S.  first published in UK in 1891

1822+              Christmas carol revival – Davies Gilbert publishes ‘Some ancient Christmas carols’.  1833 – William Sandys ‘Christmas carols ancient and modern’.  1871 – Bramley and Stainer ‘Christmas carols new and old’.

 1829                Description of lit Christmas trees at Princess Lieven (wife of Russian ambassador) at Panshanger

 1834                Christmas Day an official holiday in England and Wales

 The Victorians

 1840                Prince Albert introduced a Christmas tree into the Royal family celebrations – their tree at Windsor was pictured in the Illustrated London News etc. in 1848, which popularised the custom

 1840-50s      Christmas trees become common (references in trade catalogues, diaries etc.)

 1842                Poor Law Board – no labour except housework on Christmas Day

 1843                ‘A Charismas Carol’ by Charles Dickens published – often given as the date when the extravagant Victorian Christmas began

 1843                First commercial Christmas card sent by Sir Henry Cole designed by John Calcott Horsley.  He has c1000 hand-coloured lithographs printed.  Not common until the 1860s when cheap postal rates for cards and unsealed envelopes was introduced

1846                Tom Smith puts the crack into crackers.  Generally accepted as the inventor of the Christmas cracker, he started as a baker in London in 1830, and getting ideas from Paris etc. the cracker evolved

 1851                Queen Victoria switches from swan to turkey for Christmas dinner – some of her subjects then switch from goose to turkey

 1859                Influential handbook published on decorating churches at Christmas

 1850s-60s     Custom grows of presents to children on Christmas Day (previously given at New Year – still a custom in Scotland – and mainly for adults)

 1871                Bank Holiday Act adds Boxing Day as a holiday (Twelfth Night customs subsumed into Christmas or disappeared – e.g. Twelfth cakes turning into Christmas cakes)

 1877                ‘Christmas Day in the Workhouse’ published by George R Sims

 c1879-83         Father Christmas filling stockings becomes widespread

 1880s              Christmas Day for lighting the tree (rather than Twelfth night)

 1880                Christmas eve church service with nine lessons and carols – introduced by Archbishop of Canterbury Edward Benson – when Bishop of Truro he had introduced a service of sermon, prayer, two lessons and carols (1878).  1930 first broadcast by King’s College, Cambridge

 1882                Electric tree lights in New York, but candles were still used in UK and electric fairy lights did not become the norm until the 1930s

 1883                Parcel post introduced (encourages sending of presents – previously parcels were sent by private agencies, becomes cheaper)

 1887                                First advert for presents in The Times (12 December)

 Modern Times

1910+              Red became the customary colour for Santa Claus / Father Christmas.  Popularised in 1931 when Coca-Cola adverts had Santa in their bright red colour!

1932                First Royal broadcast – on BBC radio – by King George V

 1957                First Royal TV Christmas broadcast to the nation and Commonwealth – by Queen Elizabeth II

Have a great Christmas from all at Lanhydrock.

 

 

_

That Bodmin Speech: A Letter from the Hon.Tommy Agar-Robartes


On the 25 November 1905 Lord Rosebery was in Bodmin supporting Tommy’s nomination as Liberal candidate for south-east Cornwall. On taking the platform Rosebery made, what has become, an infamous speech that, amongst other things, effectively renounced Campbell-Bannerman’s Irish policy. His ill-judged comment of ‘I cannot serve under that banner’ highlighted the very public rift between the two men; a rift that consequently estranged Rosebery from his fellow Liberal Imperialists such as Asquith, Edward Grey and Richard Haldane.

In his letter to Arthur Quiller-Couch Tommy recalled the moment when ‘[Rosebery] got into the motor with me’ and was so filled with contrition that he said I think that is probably the last speech I shall make on a public platform’ …I should be absolutely miserable if C.B. retires, what I meant by ‘I cannot serve under that banner’ was that I could no longer take any part in this campaign. Tommy wholeheartedly supported the President of the Liberal League in his comments and concluded his letter by suggesting that he would favour Rosebery over Campbell-Bannerman as the Leader of the Liberal Party. Later it was remarked that ‘Mr Robartes was only voicing, like a parrot, the views of his political mentor’.

Tommy, the courageous yet unproven contender, did apologise for his own lapses and misjudged comments, an echo of his Oxford days when his lecturer had repeatedly warned him that he was ‘very careless and rushes wildly at a paper without thinking of what he is putting down’. He subsequently vowed to keep strictly to his usual well-prepared notes in future. Rosebery, the elder statesman, however refused to publicly refute his comments later being reported in The Times ‘that to very word, to every syllable of the Bodmin speech I absolutely adhere’. Such controversy came during a tentative period of Liberal division and party scheming. Perhaps, in the hope of precipitating a Liberal split Balfour’s government resigned within days of the Bodmin speech.

The draft letter quoted in full below was dated 28 November and was written by Tommy Agar-Robartes to the Fowey based author, Cambridge professor and local Liberal President, Arthur Quiller-Couch.

Lanhydrock Bodmin Nov 28th /05 Tuesday

Dear Mr Quiller Couch

Thank you very much for your letter which in some respects I was glad to get, as I am always glad to have a straightforward view on any subject and also to take advice; on the other hand I am sorry that you should feel aggrieved at the position & attitude I took at Bodmin this week.

I agree with you that perhaps I ought not to have I think perhaps that I was wrong in using an expression of Sir H C B’s in the way I did, but I thought at the time that it was most appropriate to Chinese Labour the expression which as far as I [can see] has the unfortunate somewhat unhappy /unfortunate phrase of the master of unfortunate /unhappy expression I am not sure of it as now /if this is [how it] came out without as you are aware I invariably use notes to a great extent & meant at Truro to just support the Resolution [in] two or three words. But in having such a kind reception I felt bound to prolong my remarks to a certain extent – but I think that perhaps in this case you are right I had no business to use the words I did & my excuse is valueless. As regards Bodmin Lord R after the meeting said to me ‘a sort of cold shudder went through the meeting after you said that the campaign was a game against C.B his name was never mentioned until his words were read on Friday morning, then I admit there was much bitterness, for owing I hope to his words having been misinterpreted, I felt that those words had ruined the prospects of the Liberal Party; that what Lord R has been striving for during the last 3 years had been knocked on the head i.e. to get back those who still who left us at the time of the Home Rule split, without whose votes I believe it is impossible to win a great Liberal victory.

You put another interpretation on /C.B. his words. I hope you are right, you admit that Home Rule in the sense in which I dislike it cannot come before the Liberals next Parliament. Then in I trust that we shall tomorrow hear tonight Sir C.B will say so I do believe that honest men are tired of the policy of evading awkward questions, I trust we may hear what the official Liberal party expect to be able to do for & and what they expect not to be able to do for Ireland. I repudiate any suggestion that that it was my desire to oust C.B & to obtain suggestion that the business was a ‘put up job’ as I have heard it described. Lord R as he got into the motor with me after Bodmin said ‘I think that is probably the last speech I shall make on a public platform’. He said to me on Monday – ‘I should be absolutely miserable if C B retires (what I meant by ‘I cannot serve under that banner was that I could take no further part in his campaign – much as I personally should like to see Lord R in the position of Leader of the Liberal party, I do not believe that he would accept the position Great as Great as is my affection for him, I put personal friendship /the Liberal party before my personal friendship. I have always been consistent I have always said I would follow C. B, as I did not believed that Home Rule was not a Living  issue. Apparently our difference is this You put one construction on his words, I another – I hope & trust you are right – we shall see tomorrow – I quite agree with every word you wrote concerning Perks[?], it was horrible to see poor Miss Golt sitting a few yards off. Even Milman was shocked! Perks was not staying here or I should has taken the liberty of telling him so – Please excuse the length of this Letter.

I am quite sure that whatever view you may take, even if you consider it your duty to oppose me politically that it will make no difference to our personal friendship.

The War Dead of Lanhydrock Parish


A paper delivered to the congregation of Lanhydrock Parish Church on 11 November 2011.

I am sure that at some point we have all stood in this wonderful church and looked at the war memorial above the door.

Of course, memorials like this are sited all over the country, in small churches, on village greens, in town squares and city parks. They are tangible reminders of the horrors of conflict but sadly their true meaning has been lost over time because the inscribed names are simply that, names. Names don’t tell us much about the people, who they were, what they did or in this case, what sequence of events led to their premature deaths.

One name, however, has endured the test of time – the Honourable Captain Thomas Charles Reginald Agar-Robartes MP or Tommy, as Lanhydrock staff past and present have referred to him. Regarding his legacy Tommy had the huge advantage over the others listed on this memorial as he was son and heir to Viscount Clifden and was set to inherit private wealth, huge tracts of Cornish, English and Irish landed estate and the hereditary Viscount Clifden title.

He did not have to go to war. Arguably his duty was serving his St Austell constituents in Parliament. But as war became increasingly likely he championed volunteer forces as being vital to the defence of the realm – indeed, Tommy himself was a volunteer in the Devon Yeomanry. When war was declared he considered his life no more important than that of any other Englishman so he insisted that he served at the front line. The effect of his actions changed Lanhydrock’s history for ever.

For in September 1915 Tommy advanced towards enemy positions at Loos in France with the 2nd Company, 1st Battalion Coldstream Guards. On 26 September during a fierce battle he ventured into no-mans-land to rescue a wounded comrade. He was hit by a sniper bullet and died in the field hospital four days later.

Four months before his death Tommy wrote to his constituents a letter headed ‘1st Coldstream Guards May 17, 1915 in a dirty ditch somewhere in France’. In this letter he voiced a familiar war time cry, he wrote,

every man can help! Every effort is required, for although our ultimate victory is certain, I would venture to remind the delegates that it is a long, long way to Berlin. So one and all must help.

Tommy’s call to arms echoed the expectation that everyone had a role to play. History tells us what these men experienced: slaughter on an unprecedented scale, inconceivable fear and hardship and depravity beyond imagination. A life far removed from the tranquillity of Lanhydrock.

Being respectful to Tommy’s obligation to ‘one and all’ I am sure he would not forgive me if I placed his memory any higher than that of his fellow parishioners. So in the spirit of ‘one and all’ it is fitting that I just touch briefly on others listed on the memorial who, like Tommy, left this idyllic location to venture into an unimaginable hell.

Clarence Hawken of Garden Cottage and William Roberts sought their fortunes abroad and entered the war under the Canadian and Australian flags respectively. Hawken died on the Somme battlefield alongside Roberts who had already survived the Gallipoli campaign. William Vanderwolf of Quarry Park Cottage survived the Somme but died later in Belgium, he has no marked grave.

Alfred Walkey was one of the 72,000 men reported missing at the Somme. As was Sergeant Thomas Fewell of Treffry Cottages whose best man at his wedding William Beare, who had already lost three brothers in battle, died himself at Loos. Charles Johns died in Basra, Iraq, whilst on campaign against the Turks, Joseph Coad died at Passchendale and Frank Blake died advancing on Jerusalem.

Sidney Smith, Lanhydrock’s groom, lived in the Harness block and was declared unfit for frontline duties. After caring for the horses of the Devon Yeomanry he died in London of influenza in the service of the Agricultural Company producing food for the war effort.

These names and places give emphasis of the war as a global conflict so it is not surprising that Tommy’s conviction to duty took him abroad ‘to’, in his own words, ‘assist by every possible means in the great struggle that lies before us…the final triumph of Great Britain and her Allies over the fiendish atrocities of our enemies’.

As you would expect Tommy’s life was quite different from these men listed above. He was born in 1880 and was educated at Eton and Oxford. He served as MP first for South-East Cornwall and then for St Austell.

He was a colourful character – an Edwardian playboy in every respect. He was a regular in Paris, Monte Carlo and London and was reported in the media as ‘a most eligible parti …greatly but unsuccessfully courted by matchmaking mammas’. When not sailing around the Mediterranean with the 5th Earl of Rosebery he would be at the wild weekend parties hosted by the Rothschild family. As a politician he was well respected, a witty and confident orator, a great champion of the Cornish and very popular amongst his constituents. He was widely regarded as the best horseman in Cornwall and the best dressed man in Parliament.

In February 1914 he drew up his will and took up an appointment as 2nd lieutenant in the Royal Bucks Hussars. Being stationed in England and not bearing the thought that others were taking risks that he did not share he joined the 1st Battalion Coldstream guards as a Captain. Yet, his impetuosity continued as in early 1915 he was reported to have said ‘I am getting fed up with all this training. I am moving heaven and earth and using all the influence I and my family possess to get to the front, because I want to do my little bit’. His wish was soon granted as in February 1915, after only a few weeks abroad, he wrote to Winston Churchill at the war office to ask if his chauffeur and valet could travel to France to pick him up to bring him home so that he could perform best man duties for Neil Primrose, son of Earl Rosebery.

Tommy returned to the front before once again being summoned home in September 1915 this time to vote in the House of Commons on the Conscription Bill. On his return his battalion had advanced on Loos. What happened next is recorded in the regimental war diary

At about 6AM on September 16 1915, two sergeant’s, Hopkins and Printer…went out in front of our trenches at the chalk pit…to bring in a wounded man. When they were about to return Hopkins was shot down by a German sniper. Sgt Printer continued on with the wounded man and brought him into the lines. Captain Robartes who had been watching the whole episode, at once went out with Sgt Printer and brought back Sgt Hopkins who was severely wounded. The whole ground in front of the chalk pit was covered in enemy machine guns, Captain Robartes was severely wounded shortly afterwards.

On 28 September Tommy was unsuccessfully recommended for a Victoria Cross for conspicuous gallantry in the field. He was, however, to be put forward for a high military decoration if he were to survive his injuries. Two days later, Tommy, aged 35, died in the 18th Casualty Clearing Station; he was mentioned in despatches on 30 November. Soon-after his best friend Neil Primrose too died of his wounds received at Gezer during the Sinai and Palestine campaigns.

On his death the Cornish Guardian reported: ‘His Death was Grand, The Cause was Just’; his mother simply wrote ‘we do not know how to bear our grief’. At the St Austell Liberal Club meeting on 8 October 1915 a great gratitude was tendered from the constituency members while more simple respects were paid by the estates of Lanhydrock and Wimpole in Cambridge both of which Tommy was set to inherit.

Sgt Hopkins survived the war and a letter of gratitude to Viscount Clifden for Tommy’s unselfish sacrifice survives in the collection to this day.

Tommy, like most named on the memorial, perhaps knew that they would never return from war. Indeed, the local liberal agent commented in the press that on the last occasion that he had met Tommy he conveyed the impression that he never expected to see England again.

Such resolution is something that people of my generation cannot fully understand. Many years back whilst visiting the war site and cemetery at Monte Cassino I had the honour of meeting two veterans of the conflict. At lunch, and by now fuelled by the local vino, I plucked up enough courage to ask them if they were scared as they ascended the terraced slopes towards the monastery. ‘No’ was the reply adding

We knew that we were going to die that day. The odds were against us. The Allies were shooting indiscriminately up the hill and offloading bombs randomly overhead. Coupled with enemy fire ahead the odds were certainly stacked up against us. In some ways advancing onto the Monastery made the time right.

For me these comments brought home to me the chaos of war, the futility, the scandal, the fear, the ultimate waste – all things that Tommy was a part of and party to.

The last words should be left to Tommy’s younger brother Alexander who in the weeks after Tommy’s death was himself invalided back to England. ‘To a Brother’ is a moving tribute

A life of charm has passed:
Cut short in all its ardency and might.
A life of peace, more glorious than the last,
Now floods this hour of darkness with its light.

We, as friends and brothers,
Bear hard this cruel loss which is his gain,
Although his life on earth he gave for others,
And smiled at death throughout his mortal pain.

Would we disturb his peace?
Nay, let us wait that meeting far more blest,
From strength to strength led on, till strife shall cease;
For him, for us, God knows it is the best.

Virtual Tour of Lanhydrock’s Gallery


Apple360 in conjunction with the National Trust have produced a great new interactive guide of our amazing Gallery.

To view the tour link to the portfolio of apple360 at
http://www.apple360.co.uk

The Lanhydrock Journal


Image

For more on Lanhydrock’s history go to


https://sites.google.com/site/lanhydrockjournals/home

The aim of this publication is to encourage an interest inthehistory of Lanhydrock House and its owners.

The essays in this journal are the result of original research undertaken voluntarily. Hence the subjects are presented for the first time and are taken from significant primary source material from the house archives and local collections.

The first Lanhydrock House Journal was produced in 2001 and has appeared every year since. Copies are held in the Courtney Library in Truro, the Morrab Library in Penzance and the Cornish Studies Library in Redruth. 

We are very grateful to all authors for their contributions, the editorial team for their support.

 

 

The Garden Urns at Lanhydrock


During the 20th-century Gerald Agar-Robartes, 7th Viscount Clifden, a very keen and competent gardener, made significant alterations to the formal gardens at Lanhydrock. In c.1925 he acquired five pairs of bronze urns that once formed part of Lord Hertford’s important collection at the Chateau de Bagatelle near Paris. These 19th-century copies, of 17th-century urns originally modelled by Claude Ballin goldsmith to Louis XIV for Versailles, were commissioned by the 4th Marquis of Hertford (1800-71) with permission of Napoleon III between 1858 and 1871.

By 1870, 46 copies were recorded as being situated in the gardens of the Chateaux de Bagatelle. The 4th Marquis was renown for having copies made of significant parts of his collection, most notably exceptional pieces of French furniture and parts of the French Imperial collections which now form part of the collections at the Wallace Collection, Manchester Square, London. Many similar urns are currently in the gardens atVersailles.

After Hertford’s death in 1871 some of the collection was bequeathed to Sir Richard Wallace who in turn left them to his secretary Sir John Murray Scott. Scott took them to Nether Swell, Gloucestershire, before being sold at auction in 1925.

During the winter of 2011/12 the urns were removed from their plinths and fully conserved by Cliveden Conservation. The old wax and excessive dirt was removed and repairs made to each urn – repairs that included the conglomeration of a split in the bronze, finials and handles that had fallen off over the years and, on the two largest urns, the base had broken away from the body. The urns were then rewaxed.

The results were amazing. No longer had we tired and dirty urns, they looked brand new.  

The next phase was to get the urns back on their granite plinths which in the main part was easy enough but with the two larger urns we had to call in the Fire Service to help.  We could not risk damaging the urns after conservation so the Fire Service deployed large A-frames and extensive rope and pully systems to raise the urns above their bases and lower gently.   

Photo. Faye Rason

The Agar-Robartes Lifeboat


by Neil Hanson

The Agar-Robartes lifeboat was stationed at the village of Porthleven, a couple of miles from Helston. It had long been thought that a lifeboat would be useful because of the number of ships driven ashore in the area, and Thomas James Agar-Robartes MP started things moving in May 1862 by presenting a barometer approved by the National Lifeboat Institution to Porthleven. The barometer was built into a wall at the head of the harbour and I can remember regularly stopping to look at it as a child – but it has gone now. Not long afterwards, on 31 July 1862, a meeting of the Lifeboat Institution was told that Agar-Robartes was prepared to donate £150 towards the cost of a lifeboat for the village. Not surprisingly, the offer was accepted and the money was presented on 31 October 1862. Agar-Robartes also promised to give a further five guineas a year towards the maintenance of a lifeboat station.

The West Briton newspaper carried a report on 27 February 1863, of the launching of the ‘beautiful new lifeboat’ at Limehouse in London. The paper said:

Her self-righting and self-ejecting qualities proved to be most satisfactory. On being capsized by a crane, she self-righted and ejected the water from inside her hull, through patent valves, in 25 seconds.

The transporting carriage was also tested. The newspaper added 

By an ingenious contrivance, the boat with her crew on board is launched off the carriage. With their oars in their hands, they are thus able to obtain headway before the breakers have time to beat the boat broadside onto the beach.

The Agar-Robartes arrived at Truro station on 4 March 1863, having been given free passage from London by the Great Western, Bristol and Exeter, South Devon and Cornwall railway companies. It was then pulled on its carriage from Truro to Porthleven by a team of seven horses – three pairs and a leader – accompanied by crowds of people and a military band. A few days later came its first official use – not at sea, but being paraded through Helston as part of the celebrations of the marriage of the Prince of Wales.

The Agar-Robartes, which cost £196, started out as a six-oared boat with a crew of nine but was converted in 1866 into a 10-oared boat needing a crew of 13. Its first emergency launch came on 5 December 1866, when it went to the aid of the Finnish barque Salmis which was seen running for the harbour in bad weather. It took the lifeboat crew an hour to pull through heavy seas to the Salmis, which had dropped both her anchors to avoid being driven ashore. Four of the lifeboat crew climbed on board by a rope and agreed to try to get the barque into Falmouth. They worked the vessel safely out of the bay during the night and into Falmouth, where they were thanked by the captain, his wife and the 16 crew for saving them.

A month later, on 5 January 1867, a severe storm forced a large number of vessels to anchor in the shelter of the cliffs off Gunwalloe and Mullion. Next morning, a schooner was seen to be in danger of going ashore. It was too rough to launch the lifeboat at Porthleven, so six horses were hitched to the carriage in order to drag it 10 miles to Gunwalloe. As they passed through Helston on that Sunday morning they gathered quite a following from people who abandoned the idea of going to church so they could watch the excitement. Unfortunately, the schooner – the Margaret, of Teignmouth – parted her anchor cable before the Agar-Robartes could reach the scene, and went ashore with the loss of four crew from a total complement of five.

On 10 September 1867 the Agar Robartes took part in a parade to commemorate the opening of Penzance Public Buildings and launching of the new Mullion lifeboat, the Daniel J Draper. In all, six lifeboats took part, the first time so many had been seen together in any port in the United Kingdom, and thousands of people gathered to watch. After the launching, the six lifeboats – the Agar-Robartes (Porthleven), Richard Lewis (Penzance), Daniel J Draper (Mullion), Moses (St Ives), Isis (Hayle) and Two Cousins (Sennen) – took part in a race. As it ended, one of the Porthleven crewmen, Edward Williams, a fisherman, collapsed and was pronounced dead from heart disease. An appeal was launched to raise money for Edward Williams’s widow and nine children so that their immediate needs could be provided for. Because of the unusual nature of the event, the Illustrated London News published an account of the day – including an illustration of the lifeboat race (although they missed the news line that someone had died). The report and picture were published on 21 September 1867. On 6 December 1868, the North Briton, a 700-ton barque, was observed on a lee shore with a heavy sea running. She made anchor between St Michael’s Mount and Penzance and some of the crew tried to reach shore in one of their boats but it soon capsised and six of the 10 men on board were lost. While the Agar-Robartes was being hauled overland to Praa Sands to help, the Penzance lifeboat was twice capsised by the tremendous seas – but a second crew eventually succeeded in reaching the barque and took off the nine remaining crewmen.

Eight weeks later the Agar-Robartes was again dragged the five miles to Praa Sands to help a 320-ton barque, the Choice – only to find that three men were already drowned and the other eight rescued by ropes. On 6 March 1871, another barque, the Grisi or Greesa, struck Praa Sands. A rocket line was fired at the wreck, and 14 men were brought ashore. Then, just as the rescue was completed, the Agar-Robartes again came into view. The crew must have felt very frustrated indeed. The sound of exploding rockets sent the crew of the Agar-Robartes running to their lifeboat on 23 November 1872, when another barque was seen about two miles off Porthleven. It was obvious to all those watching that she would not be able to beat out of the bay and must run for the shore. Scores of men lined the cliff-top to help when, to the surprise of all, a boat was spotted leaving the vessel and making for the shore. The lifeboat crew could only watch helplessly as a huge wave engulfed the boat and eight men aboard. The barque, the Lochleven Flower, drifted onto the rocks beyond Gunwalloe where she was soon wrecked. The Agar-Robartes continued in service until 1882.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.